52 Repealed: 2011, c. 1, Sched. 2, s. 6.
Part Amendments with date in effect (d/m/y)
Order of Registrar re: false marketing
53 (1) If the Registrar thinks on reasonable grounds that a licensee is creating a false, deceptive or misleading declaration relating up to a cash advance or a cash advance contract in almost any product published by any means, including an advertisement, circular or pamphlet, the Registrar may,
(a) order the cessation of this utilization of the product;
(b) purchase the licensee to retract the declaration or publish a modification of equal prominence to your publication that is original or
(c) order both a cessation described in clause (a) and a retraction or modification described in clause (b). 2008, c. 9, s. 53 (1).
(2) area 13 relates with necessary customizations to a purchase under this area in the manner that is same up to a proposition by the Registrar to refuse to issue a licence. 2008, c. 9, s. 53 (2).
(3) The purchase associated with the Registrar shall immediately take effect, nevertheless the Tribunal may give a stay before the Registrar’s purchase becomes last. 2008, c. 9, s. 53 (3).
(4) In the event that licensee doesn’t allure a purchase under this area or if the Tribunal upholds your purchase or a variation of it, the licensee shall, upon the demand regarding the Registrar, distribute all statements in just about any advertisement, circular, pamphlet or material become posted in the slightest to your Registrar for approval before book for the period of time that the Registrar specifies. 2008, c. 9, s. 53 (4).
(5) The Registrar shall perhaps perhaps not specify under subsection (4) an interval,
(a) that surpasses a period of time that is recommended; or
(b) any component of which falls outside of the duration that is recommended. 2008, c. 9, s. 53 (5).
54 (1) If it seems towards the Director that a individual or entity is not complying with this specific Act or the laws or an purchase made under this Act, the Director may connect with the Superior Court of Justice for an purchase directing the individual or entity to comply, and, upon the applying, the court will make the purchase that the court thinks fit. 2008, c. 9, s. 54 (1).
(2) Subsection (1) is applicable as well as other procedures which may be available to the Director, set up Director has exercised their liberties under such procedures. 2008, c. 9, s. 54 (2).
(3) An appeal lies to your Divisional Court from a purchase made under subsection (1). 2008, c. 9, s. 54 (3).
55 (1) a individual or entity is accountable of a offense who,
(a) furnishes information that is false any application under this Act or in every statement or get back needed under this Act;
(b) doesn’t conform to any purchase under this Act;
(c) contravenes or fails to comply with any area of the Act or the laws; or
(d) efforts to commit any offense mentioned in clause (a), (b) or (c). 2008, c. 9, s. 55 (1).
(2) An officer or manager of a business whom doesn’t simply simply just just take care that is reasonable avoid the company from committing an offense mentioned in subsection (1) is bad associated with offense. 2008, c. 9, s. 55 (2).
(3) someone or entity that is convicted of a offense under this Act is likely to,
(a) a superb of only $50,000 or even to imprisonment for a term of only couple of years less a time, or both, in the event that individual or entity can be an specific; or
(b) an excellent of only $250,000, in the event that person or entity just isn’t a person. 2008, c. 9, s. 55 (3).
(4) No proceeding under this part will probably be commenced a lot more than couple of years following the reality upon which the proceeding relies first found the information associated with the Director. 2008, c. 9, s. 55 (4).
Sales for payment, restitution
56 if your installment loans for bad credit individual or entity is convicted of a offense under this Act, the court making the conviction may, as well as other penalty, order the individual or entity convicted to cover payment or make restitution. 2008, c. 9, s. 56.
Standard in re re re payment of fines or charges
57 (1) in cases where a cost mentioned in subsection (2) is in standard for at the very minimum 60 times, the Director may reveal up to a customer reporting agency the title associated with the defaulter, the cost plus the date the cost went into standard. 2008, c. 9, s. 57 (1).
(2) Subsection (1) pertains to the following fees: